Yuku free message boards

Cloudwalker wrot

These women say they are in favor of equality, but are really only in favor of getting rid of the aspects of sexism that adversely effect them.

Free men have never had to "fight" for social value and worth, or to defend their own physical attributes. Men have never been denied the right to vote or bring about change in political arenas. Men have never had laws defining the limitations of physical abuse they could endure at the hand (stick) of their spouse, or be considered property by law. Men have never had to bear the hardship of being labeled "unseemly" or "whore" for their style of clothing, or that 'dreaded mistake' of raising the desire of their sexual attacker. Men have never had to hand over their property rights to their spouse or stand in a court of law and battle for the privilege of being called a "person." The list goes on and on when it comes to what women had to meet with before women's rights. Equal rights for women at no time included "getting rid" of anything other than the unfair (and ignorant) idea that women were incapable of being just as beneficial to society's growth as a man and/or that they were not mentally competent at making financial or familial decisions.

Bullshit. Working men had to 'fight' for the right to vote and to unionise. True, even to this day the law is reluctant to admit hat men suffer violence at the hands of women and often so are the men, while it has always been tradition that a gentleman never strikes a lady no matter what she does to him. Men and boys are frequently harrassed and physically attacked for stepping out of strict dress conformity in quite minute respects and are still not accepted to wear "women's" clothes, while women have been free for some 50 years to dress like men or any other way they choose. Perhaps you are too young to remember the 1960s Civil Rights riots or even South Africa as recently as 20 years ago. The idea that women are less beneficial to society than men exists purely in Feminist minds (and perhaps a few male chauvinists) who reject any social values except economic and political. What does society exist for except to allow people to raise a family together? It is true that for a period of 100 years or so women freed themselves from having to work so they could have the freedom of running their own home with the man working for them, though of course in those days only the lowest classes worked for a living at all.

So what if women want to get rid of the aspects of sexism that adversely effect them. Does that make a man less of a man? Are you suggesting men don't ask or wish for the same?

It's funny how men define "equality for women" as, by default, meaning "treated like a man" rather than "treated equally to a man."

No, that is what feminists claim to want and when they get it complain of no longer being trreated as delicate social superiors expecting to be treated with kid glove deference. 'Real' women are just as capable of F-ing and blinding as men without curling up in a feminist huddle whining how nasty men are being when they get it right back. When will women start treating men with the respect they traditionally demand of men?

I tend to think money will win over 80-90% of women, when it comes down to it.

A man divorces his wife of 30 years to marry a young twit with a tight ass who wants his money and he is envied while she is vilified.
I tend to think 80-90% of men want a young twit with a tight ass. Lucky for those guys with money who tend to think like you.

And how many young men set out on a course knowing they can live a life of luxury with a rich woman to look after them? Where is the equality between women able to exploit men's money and the men they exploit?

So women not only have to remain understanding while men use the Madonna-whore complex as an excuse for infidelity, we also have to contend with men thinking we are out for their $$ as well?

...and they still scratch their heads when they get dumped for the pool boy